top of page

Predictive Maintenance Integration

When companies begin exploring incorporating ultrasound technology and devices into their preventive maintenance (PM) and predictive maintenance (PdM) programs it can be very confusing for first time buyers. In the ultrasound marketplace today there is a lot of hype, a wide range in prices, and more often than not, mixed and confusing messages as to the true capabilities of these devices and the results one might come to expect. Let’s begin by stating that ultrasound is not a replacement for other technologies such as infrared thermography, vibration analysis or fluid analysis but rather a complimentary and valuable technology. Ultrasound provides companies more information about the health of their physical plant and often provides this information earlier than other technologies. By being able to “listen” to your plant’s equipment and machinery, one can detect nuisances and abnormalities well in advance of the development of other characteristics such as heat buildup (detectable through thermography and fluid analysis) or audible detectable physical changes (vibration analysis).

How to look for what’s important versus the extraneous

Within each of these key factors to consider are guidelines that will help you find the answer. Listed below is some tale telling things to be looking for and why. Too much emphasis on product differentiation for the sake of being different may simply be to confuse buyers with bells and whistles. We’ll take an examination of some of the fluff that’s out there and filter down to what’s really important and guide you to the right product criteria.

Digital versus Analog Meters

Sound is analog by nature. To display sound levels with a digital meter requires first converting the ultrasound amplitude to digital then sampling or averaging the numbers, otherwise the digital meter would be changing so fast as to be unreadable. So digital meters will display either a peak number or an average. This is far less accurate than an analog meter displaying the signal strength in real time. Analog users just have to watch the needle rise as you approach the sound source. Analog meters indicate both real-time amplitude, amplitude over time, spikes or valleys (indicating anomalies, especially for rotating machinery). Digital meters typically also draw down a battery faster. The only time you need to digitize the sound is to record them, which has nothing to do with meters. In the next paragraph you’ll see another major drawback for digital meters.

Clearer Reception / Less Background Noise

Most all ultrasound devices can hear loud ultrasound. However, for most applications, you want to hear even low amplitude ultrasound whether it’s for leak detection in pressurized air/gas/vacuum systems or to be able to differentiate between bearings (normal, under lubricated, defective). One of the biggest problems for first time ultrasound users is being able to distinguish detectable low volume ultrasound from any inherent background noise that the device itself may introduce. This is particularly true of lower quality ultrasound devices. Be aware that digital meters and displays through their electronics induce background (“white”) noise. Analog displays do not have this characteristic and therefore provide clearer and sharper sound to the headset.

Also, the methodology used to convert or bring the ultrasound down into the human audible range can vary significantly from one device to other. Superior technology allows you to hear down converted sound that is a more characteristic representation of the original sound. Some conversion technologies including heterodyning may allow for distortion or warble of the original sound. Heterodyning that may be great for music maybe but not necessarily for ultrasound based diagnostics. Also, with a quality ultrasound device, you should hear silence when there is no detectable ultrasound. A technician should leave the guesswork out of the equation when trying to distinguish background noise from detectable ultrasound. A quality device will not have electronics that introduces background noise resulting in more guesswork, more false positives, and less consistent diagnostic results.

Ease of Operation

There are many products out on the market that try to differentiate themselves by adding bells and whistles that only complicate the usage. They try to convince potential buyers that these features allow them to detect ultrasound that they wouldn’t otherwise. Take the ability to adjust frequencies. For some ultrasound devices this may be a necessary evil. One such example is having to lower the frequency to hear something such as a water leak. Fact is that the sound propagation of a water leak sweeps over a range of frequencies, not just one. Making users change frequencies for different applications also has the drawback that if not properly set to the right frequency, you may miss a leak or abnormality. Adjustable frequency settings may be a product differentiator but try to stick to the essentials. Choose a device that allows users to more intuitively use it without complicated settings and less likely to be misused.


Your plant engineers are going to be out on the plant floor taking dozens and dozens of readings over several hours. The form and fit of the device can play into how likely the user will want to shorten his time using the device. With some pistol style devices, you have to squeeze a trigger to turn it on. After you release the trigger, it will turn off within a few seconds. This is to conserve battery life. And, at the end of the day, your hand will feel like it’s been squeezing a trigger on and off all day. Some devices, especially with LED displays, often have auto shut-off mechanisms to conserve battery life. You want a device that when you turn on, it stays on. Put it down, write a note or tag a leak, its still on until you decide to turn it off. There are advantages to acquiring a device that is meant for true one-handed operation, even when adjusting the sensitivity. It is preferable to not have to use one hand to hold the device while the other hand adjusts a knob or changes a setting.


Just like with the ergonomics of the ultrasound device, weight is also an issue. Again, we are talking about carrying this device for hours out on the plant floor pointing and probing throughout the day. Lighter weight is good. Some devices, especially with built in recording capability, weigh over two pounds. That can be fatiguing after hours of use. If you need recording capability, select a device wherein the recording end of the device can be worn on a belt pouch or in a pocket. Remember, you most likely will be using the same hand to use and carry the device all day. Ideally, you would want a device that the recording electronics and housing can be detached from the receiver for applications that don’t need recording such as air leak detection.